Banner
Home

Is there a case against shared decision making? Print E-mail
Written by Michel Accad, MD | KevinMD   
Tuesday, 24 July 2018 18:09
 
In a matter of less than a decade, "shared decision-making" (SDM) has emerged as the uncontested principle that must inform doctor-patient relationships everywhere. Consistently lauded by ethicists and medical academics alike, it has attracted the attention of the government which is now threatening to penalize doctors and patients who do not participate in SDM prior to providing certain treatments, even if the legal process of informed consent has been fulfilled - and even if the treatment is widely considered to be clinically justified.
 
For example, in a recent issue of JAMA, an editorial approvingly reports that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services will soon refuse to pay physicians and hospitals for the implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators unless the decision to implant these life-saving devices was "shared" with the patient. Although the announcement is short on details regarding the formal process by which SDM must be documented to have occurred, the new policy certainly testifies to the unquestioned status SDM has rapidly acquired as a general principle of medical ethics.
 
 
Last Updated on Tuesday, 24 July 2018 18:11
 


Banner
Website design, development, and hosting provided by
Netphiles